TSTP Solution File: ITP135^1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : ITP135^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 08:07:05 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.44s 0.67s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  13 unt;  11 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (  12 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   67 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  63   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    5 (   4 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   14 (  14   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   ^   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    paraco1605129243lle_tv: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort3,type,
    list_char: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort4,type,
    paraco1604210848lle_fm: $tType ).

thf(decl_53,type,
    paraco761681009ge_int: ( nat > nat ) > ( list_char > paraco1605129243lle_tv ) > list_char > paraco1605129243lle_tv ).

thf(decl_54,type,
    paraco1147068288nge_tv: ( nat > nat ) > paraco1605129243lle_tv > paraco1605129243lle_tv ).

thf(decl_56,type,
    paraco1325918602e_eval: ( list_char > paraco1605129243lle_tv ) > paraco1604210848lle_fm > paraco1605129243lle_tv ).

thf(decl_63,type,
    paraco1344940915le_Det: $o > paraco1605129243lle_tv ).

thf(decl_155,type,
    f: nat > nat ).

thf(decl_156,type,
    i: list_char > paraco1605129243lle_tv ).

thf(decl_158,type,
    p2: paraco1604210848lle_fm ).

thf(conj_0,conjecture,
    ( ( paraco1325918602e_eval @ ( paraco761681009ge_int @ f @ i ) @ p2 )
    = ( paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0kIFeVpLpI/E---3.1_18991.p',conj_0) ).

thf(fact_2_ih2,axiom,
    ( ( paraco1325918602e_eval @ ( paraco761681009ge_int @ f @ i ) @ p2 )
    = ( paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f @ ( paraco1325918602e_eval @ i @ p2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0kIFeVpLpI/E---3.1_18991.p',fact_2_ih2) ).

thf(fact_0_a,axiom,
    ( ( paraco1325918602e_eval @ i @ p2 )
    = ( paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0kIFeVpLpI/E---3.1_18991.p',fact_0_a) ).

thf(fact_1__092_060open_062change__tv_Af_A_Ieval_Ai_Ap2_J_A_061_ADet_ATrue_092_060close_062,axiom,
    ( ( paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f @ ( paraco1325918602e_eval @ i @ p2 ) )
    = ( paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0kIFeVpLpI/E---3.1_18991.p',fact_1__092_060open_062change__tv_Af_A_Ieval_Ai_Ap2_J_A_061_ADet_ATrue_092_060close_062) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( paraco1325918602e_eval @ ( paraco761681009ge_int @ f @ i ) @ p2 )
   != ( paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])]) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( paraco1325918602e_eval @ ( paraco761681009ge_int @ f @ i ) @ p2 )
   != ( paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

thf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( ( paraco1325918602e_eval @ ( paraco761681009ge_int @ f @ i ) @ p2 )
    = ( paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f @ ( paraco1325918602e_eval @ i @ p2 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_2_ih2]) ).

thf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ( paraco1325918602e_eval @ i @ p2 )
    = ( paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0_a]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( paraco1325918602e_eval @ ( paraco761681009ge_int @ f @ i ) @ p2 )
   != ( paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ( paraco1325918602e_eval @ ( paraco761681009ge_int @ f @ i ) @ p2 )
    = ( paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f @ ( paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true ) ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ( paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f @ ( paraco1325918602e_eval @ i @ p2 ) )
    = ( paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_1__092_060open_062change__tv_Af_A_Ieval_Ai_Ap2_J_A_061_ADet_ATrue_092_060close_062]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f @ ( paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true ) )
   != ( paraco1344940915le_Det @ $true ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_7]),c_0_11]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.18/0.19  % Problem    : ITP135^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.18/0.20  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.20/0.41  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.41  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.20/0.41  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.20/0.41  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.20/0.41  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.20/0.41  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 13:03:02 EDT 2024
% 0.20/0.41  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.26/0.61  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.44/0.61  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0kIFeVpLpI/E---3.1_18991.p
% 0.44/0.67  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.44/0.67  # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSMNHSA.
% 0.44/0.67  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting full_lambda_7 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting new_ho_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting lpo5_fix with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # full_lambda_7 with pid 19071 completed with status 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Result found by full_lambda_7
% 0.44/0.67  # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSMNHSA.
% 0.44/0.67  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting full_lambda_7 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,2.5,,3,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.44/0.67  # Search class: HGUSM-FSLM31-DHSFFMBN
% 0.44/0.67  # partial match(1): HGUSM-FSLM31-DHSFFFBN
% 0.44/0.67  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting new_bool_5 with 135s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # new_bool_5 with pid 19075 completed with status 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Result found by new_bool_5
% 0.44/0.67  # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSMNHSA.
% 0.44/0.67  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting full_lambda_7 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,2.5,,3,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.44/0.67  # Search class: HGUSM-FSLM31-DHSFFMBN
% 0.44/0.67  # partial match(1): HGUSM-FSLM31-DHSFFFBN
% 0.44/0.67  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.44/0.67  # Starting new_bool_5 with 135s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.67  # Preprocessing time       : 0.007 s
% 0.44/0.67  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.44/0.67  
% 0.44/0.67  # Proof found!
% 0.44/0.67  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.44/0.67  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.44/0.67  # Parsed axioms                        : 518
% 0.44/0.67  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 409
% 0.44/0.67  # Initial clauses                      : 335
% 0.44/0.67  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 43
% 0.44/0.67  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 292
% 0.44/0.67  # Processed clauses                    : 15
% 0.44/0.67  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.44/0.67  # ...remaining for further processing  : 12
% 0.44/0.67  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.44/0.67  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.44/0.67  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Total rewrite steps                  : 4
% 0.44/0.67  # ...of those cached                   : 2
% 0.44/0.67  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.44/0.67  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.44/0.67  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.44/0.67  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.44/0.67  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.44/0.67  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.44/0.67  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.44/0.67  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.44/0.67  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.44/0.67  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.44/0.67  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.44/0.67  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.44/0.67  # Current number of processed clauses  : 11
% 0.44/0.67  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.44/0.67  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.44/0.67  #    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 0.44/0.67  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 278
% 0.44/0.67  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1231
% 0.44/0.67  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.44/0.67  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.44/0.67  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.44/0.67  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.44/0.67  # Condensation attempts                : 15
% 0.44/0.67  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.44/0.67  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 28016
% 0.44/0.67  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 9348
% 0.44/0.67  
% 0.44/0.67  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.44/0.67  # User time                : 0.026 s
% 0.44/0.67  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.44/0.67  # Total time               : 0.034 s
% 0.44/0.67  # Maximum resident set size: 3868 pages
% 0.44/0.67  
% 0.44/0.67  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.44/0.67  # User time                : 0.040 s
% 0.44/0.67  # System time              : 0.013 s
% 0.44/0.67  # Total time               : 0.053 s
% 0.44/0.67  # Maximum resident set size: 2844 pages
% 0.44/0.67  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.44/0.67  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------